Contract Employee's Newsletter
Helping Contract Professionals Manage Their Careers

Vol. 3, No. 4
February 14, 2003

Edited by James R. Ziegler

A Companion to:
The Contract Employee's Handbook
www.cehandbook.com

Sponsored by:
P.A.C.E. - Professional Association for Contract Employment
www.pacepros.com

 


About The Contract Employee's Newsletter

The Contract Employee's Newsletter is a free online publication for technical and professional contractors containing news, commentary, tips, links to useful resources, nuggets of wisdom submitted by readers, and anything else that seems appropriate at the time. The CENewsletter is published bi-weekly or whenever issues warrant and time allows. The subscriber list is confidential and will not be disclosed outside this organization.


In This Issue

Read recent issues of The Contract Employee's Newsletter.


News and Views

Contractors File Lawsuit Against Hewlett Packard

Two agency contractors have initiated a class-action lawsuit against Hewlett Packard in Santa Clara (California) Superior Court claiming the hi-tech giant often made them work more than 40 hours a week, but would only pay them for the first 40 hours.

Companies often make their exempt regular employees work more than 8 hours a day, and "professional days" up to 12 hours long are not uncommon. But companies must pay hourly contractors for every hour worked. These contractors, according to the lawsuit, claim that they each routinely worked more than 80 hours in a week, but were never paid for time beyond 40 hours.

By denying payment for work in excess of 40 hours HP was treating the workers like their own regular employees. But that's not the only way that HP treated the two workers like employees.

One of the contractors, a software programmer and software engineer, had worked as a contractor at HP for more than seven and one-half years, while the other, who is also a programmer, had worked at HP for two years. Clearly, on this basis they resembled regular employees of HP more than they resembled contractors on temporary assignments.

At the core of HP's vulnerability, according to the lawsuit, is the fact that the two software programmers were common-law employees who did work that was "part of the regular and customary business of HP." They worked on-site at HP, side-by-side with HP employees, doing the same work as HP employees, under the close supervision of an HP project manager.

Also, according to the lawsuit, their HP supervisor told them that "they will be terminated if they offer any objections or resistance to receiving no compensation for the hours that they work in excess of 40 hours per week." IRS guidelines are very clear on the point that companies may fire an employee, but they may only terminate the contract of a staffing vendor or independent contractor.

Apparently, HP had bought into the common fraud perpetrated by the temporary staffing industry that employment by a third party employer of record is sufficient to protect a company from claims of co-employment. This is patently false.

P.A.C.E. has identified at least 35 different risk factors associated with hiring contingent workers, and third-party employers of record offer protection against none of them. Running contingent workers through an ordinary staffing vendor may mitigate (lessen) some of the tax risks. But that's all, and that's not enough.

Government agencies with jurisdiction over employees, including the IRS, are very clear on the point that co-employment is determined by the relationship between the company and the worker regardless of who actually processes the worker's payroll.

One would hope that a company the size of HP would have systems in place to prevent the kinds of abuses claimed in the lawsuit. But the reality is that very few front line and middle managers understand the complexities of co-employment law, preferring instead to outsource their concerns to temp agencies, recruiting firms, and to on-site vendor management services.

Companies need a strong division of employment to provide an effective affirmative defense against reclassification and class action lawsuits, and using a staffing vendor to mitigate co-employment is a very weak defense, indeed, as the HP lawsuit demonstrates.

Fortunately, P.A.C.E. offers companies the nation's first and only automated digital division of employment for the contingent workforce.

P.A.C.E. ProTect with ComplianceSecurityTM tracks, manages, issues alerts, and generates reports on every conceivable risk factor associated with a company's contingent workforce: Tax risks, ERISA risks, EEOC risks, Retroactive Benefits risks, Title VII risks, ADA risks, Unemployment risks, Permatemp risks, OSHA risks, Security risks, Workers Compensation risks, Intellectual Property risks, Visa risks, and the list goes on.

If a company's Legal Counsel can identify a risk factor, P.A.C.E. ProTect with ComplianceSecurityTM will track it and manage it.

ComplianceSecurityTM manages all types of contractual staffing arrangements, including sole proprietors (1099s), one-person corporations, consulting firm employees, and agency temps.

If HP had managed its contingent workforce risk factors with ComplianceSecurityTM it would have certainly avoided a class-action lawsuit. That is because with ComplianceSecurityTM in place a company no longer has to rely on the judgment of front line managers or a vendor management service to manage compliance. ComplianceSecurityTM does all the tracking, alerting, and reporting automatically.

ComplianceSecurityTM even has a built-in procedure for handling internal complaints by contract workers so they cannot be mishandled as was apparently the case with HP. When issues arise they are dealt with immediately by the appropriate authority in a manner that assures full accountability.

In addition to managing the risk factors associated with hiring contingent workers, ComplianceSecurityTM facilitates direct sourcing of Contract Professionals for huge savings by incorporating the industry's most comprehensive automated recruiting systems.

Companies can choose from three levels of direct sourcing technologies:

  1. Automated e-recruiting using any of several highly sophisticated direct sourcing engines.

  2. Human assistance with the evaluation of resumes, verification of availability, background checks, initial interviews, and preparation of a short-list of candidates.

  3. Ongoing mentoring and coaching of the company's staff on direct sourcing techniques so that HR can learn to compete effectively with costly and contentious recruiting firms.

When companies direct source their talent, Contract Professionals are free to contract directly with the client company or, if necessary, select their own employer of record (such as P.A.C.E.). This is good for Contract Professionals, and it's good for the companies that use their consulting services.

In this regard, P.A.C.E. operates on the principle that independent contract professionals and the companies that use their consulting services will both benefit from an open, ethical, and evenhanded alternative to traditional staffing vendors. Contract Professionals and companies know this. That's why they recommend P.A.C.E.

ComplianceSecurityTM is a Linux-based ASP application that integrates fully with existing HR information systems and applicant tracking systems, and with all the major ERP systems.

The system requires no change management by HR professionals and project managers, so companies that adopt ComplianceSecurityTM may continue to recruit and hire contingent workers the way they always have. It's just that with ComplianceSecurityTM it will be far more difficult to make the kinds of mistakes that lead to government audits and class-action lawsuits.

ComplianceSecurityTM renders ordinary staffing vendors and vendor management systems just plain obsolete.

Read more about the HP class-action lawsuit at http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/01/22/BU217297.DTL&type=business

Return to Table of Contents.


Marketing Tips

Create A Killer Ad

While reading the newspaper recently I came across an ad for a Real Estate seminar that really caught my attention. The header, in large, bold print, proclaimed:

156 IDEAS
Guaranteed to Improve
Your Real Estate
Advertising & Marketing.

Followed by:

In this fast-paced workshop you will discover…

  • How to create dynamic personal promotion

  • How to write ads that grab attention & get calls

  • How to gain more qualified buyers & sellers

  • The newest marketing trends to increase your sales

Immediately below this bulleted list was a textbox with another header and two compelling testimonials. The header shouted:

Write Ads That
Make Your Telephone Ring!
More Calls = More Sales

Adjacent to the box was a picture of the smiling, confidant, and obviously successful presenter, under which were the words:

Acclaimed International Speaker
"Speaker's Name In Large Typeface"

Below the speaker's name was this very compelling summary of experience:

Pick up valuable tips from someone who really knows real estate markets. [Speaker's Name], CEO of [Name of the speaker's company], is an experienced real estate broker/owner and full-time trainer and consultant. For eleven years, he has been invited to speak at the National Association of Realtors annual convention. Audiences enjoy his up-beat and humorous presentations plus his business-boosting ideas.

Now I am not at all interested in Real Estate, but this ad really "grabbed" my attention. In fact, I am thinking of going to the seminar just to learn about the marketing techniques for their own sake. To heck with the Real Estate tips.

Could you adapt this ad to create a flyer for your own consulting business? I bet you could. Pull out all the stops. Create your own headers and bulleted list of benefits.

Throw in a few, short, snappy testimonials from happy clients, and a compelling summary of experience adapted from your 30-second pitch. Are you photogenic? Even if you aren't a professional photographer can create a studio photo that projects the image of a confident, capable professional, under which you might write:

Acclaimed Software Developer
"Your Name In Big Print"

Attach this flyer to your skills profile (Needy victims of unemployment use a resume. Confident consultants use a skills profile). Send it to your contacts along with a letter announcing your availability.

Keep extra copies of this flyer in your car, purse or briefcase so you can hand it out to prospects and interested parties. Include your flyer along with a note to people with whom you exchange business cards.

Consultants don't have a product that they can shrink-wrap in fancy packaging with pictures of sexy models, but they can "package" their skills in a snappy flyer with compelling ad copy.

If this sounds too forward, it may indicate that you are not very confident of your skills and ability. Confident consultants know how to blow their own horn when they have to. As a result, confident consultants work more hours at higher billing rates.

Test your confidence and create your own dynamic ad. Check out your local newspaper for further examples of effective ads. Use these ads as templates for your own ad. It's simple. All you have to do is change a few words, and voilà, an ad for Dr. Feelgood's Painless Laser Surgery is transformed into an ad for Mary Business Analyst's Painless Business Consulting.

Return to Table of Contents


Contract Employee's Glossary

Terminology For Contract Professionals
More terms from Appendix B: Glossary of Terms for Contract Professionals of The Contract Employee's Handbook.

Legal Representatives, Successors and Assigns
Contracts commonly contain language similar to the following: “This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their legal representative, successors, assigns, and personal representatives.” These are nonparties to a contract who may acquire or exercise rights under the contract through inheritance or acquisition, or through other means.

Letter of agreement
An informal contract in the form of a letter.

Limited liability company (LLC)
The limited liability form of business affords most of the protection of the corporate form, but with simpler reporting requirements, and generally lower fees. Like shareholders of a corporation, LLC members are protected from personal liability for business debts and claims. As with sole proprietorships, partnerships, and S-corporations the business income of an LLC passes through the business to each LLC member, who reports their share of profits or losses on their individual income tax returns. Each LLC member makes quarterly estimated tax payments to the IRS. An LLC may have a single member in all states but Massachusetts and the District of Columbia.

Limited liability partnership (LLP)
A limited liability company with more than one member. Some states reserve the designation LLP for professionals, such as lawyers, accountants, architects and health care providers.

Litigation
Litigation is a judicial proceeding by which parties seek to settle a dispute in the courts through a lawsuit or a judicial contest. In addition to litigation, parties to a contract may seek a settlement through arbitration (enforced settlement) or mediation (facilitated meeting of the minds).

Return to Table of Contents.


The Contract Employee's Project

The Contract Employee's Project is the larger context under which the following interrelated vehicles operate to promote and defend the interests of Contract Professionals:

  • The Contract Employee's Handbook
  • The Contract Employee's Newsletter
  • The Contract Employee's Workshop
  • Professional Association for Contract Employment (P.A.C.E.)

    Return to Table of Contents.


Copyright and Publication Info

Copyright (c) 2003, James R. Ziegler. All rights reserved.

You may copy or forward this free publication provided it is left intact with all links and this notice unchanged. Any unauthorized duplication, including republication in part or in full for commercial use, is an infringement of copyright.

Published by:
P.A.C.E. - Professional Association for Contract Employment
1355 Willow Way, Suite 244
Concord, CA 94520
USA
http://www.pacepros.com/

Editor:
James R. Ziegler, Ph.D.
Executive Director
P.A.C.E. -- Professional Association for Contract Employment
(925) 680-0200
cenewsletters@pacepros.com

Return to Table of Contents.


Disclaimer

The Contract Employee's Newsletter is designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter covered. Use is granted with the understanding that the publisher and authors are not engaged in rendering legal or financial advice. If expert assistance is required you should seek the services of a competent professional.

The purpose of this information is to educate and entertain. The publisher and contributors shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to be caused, directly or indirectly, by the information contained in this Newsletter or by information contained in any web site or resource referenced by citation or hypertext link within the pages of this Newsletter.

Return to Table of Contents.


Subscribe to The Contract Employee's Newsletter

The Contract Employee's Newsletter: Sign Up Now! Useful News & Updates

Return to Table of Contents.


Sign-off

I hope you have found the information in this newsletter to be interesting, informative, and provocative. I encourage you to share the CENewsletter with your friends, colleagues, coworkers, clients, and agency recruiters.

Why clients? Because you need every ally you can get. Why agency recruiters? Because they need to know the jig is up.

Wishing you success in your contracting career,

James R. Ziegler, Ph.D.
Executive Director
P.A.C.E. -- Professional Association for Contract Employment

Return to Table of Contents.


>>> Return to the P.A.C.E. Home Page